LEGAL LANGUAGE IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW OF LANGUAGE SIMPLIFICATION PROJECTS
Received: 21st March 2022; Revised: 03rd June 2022, 19th June 2022, 23rd June 2022; Accepted: 24th June 2022
Keywords:Legal Language, Apps, Developers, Users, Icons, Guideline
Ordinary subscribers face difficulties in understanding legal language, jargon, legislation and contract terms included in the privacy policies or terms of services used in the digital services, especially in smartphone apps. In particular, software developers are expected to include simpler language to comply with the legal provisions, and the users demand clearer language in the privacy policies or terms of services of the apps to provide informed consent. This paper reviews two projects that aim to simplify legal languages, one for developers and one for users. The primary aim of these projects is to encourage clearer legal language and provide reforms and proposals to improve current practices. It has been revealed that these efforts to simplify legal language are applied to specific categories and narrow fields and do not replace the original legal documents.
Al Rezan, M., Ershadul Karim, M (2021). Challenges and Complexities of the Terms and Conditions in the Digital Ecosystem: Use Of Legal Design as an Alternative. UiTM
International Conference on Law & Society 2021 (UiTM i-CLaS 2021), 1–2 November 2021.
Apple. App privacy details on the App Store. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/app-privacy-details/ (Addition: Apple App Store Preview, WhatsApp Messenger, 2022)
Arbi, L. H. (2021). A Contract Theory Approach to Islamic Financial Securities with an Application to Diminishing Mushārakah. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14010017
Conway, L. (1996, October 15). The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations. (Research Paper 96/93) Business & Transport Section, House of Commons Library.
Draper, N. A., & Turow, J. (2019). The corporate cultivation of digital resignation. New Media & Society, 21(8), 1824-1839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819833331
Elshout, M., Elsen, M., Leenheer, J., Loos, M., & Luzak, J. (2016). Study on Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Terms Conditions (T&Cs) Final Report. Report for the European Commission, Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) on behalf of Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers. Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) on behalf of Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 2018. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Hatamian, M. (2020). Engineering privacy in smartphone apps: A technical guideline catalog for app developers. IEEE Access, 8, 35429-35445. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974911
Holtz, L. E., Nocun, K., & Hansen, M. (2010, August). Towards displaying privacy information with icons. In IFIP primelife international summer school on privacy and identity management for life (pp. 338-348). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20769-3_27
Kohlmeier, A., & Klemola, M. (2021). The Legal Design Book: Doing Law in the 21st Century.
Li, T., Louie, E., Dabbish, L., & Hong, J. I. (2021). How Developers Talk About Personal Data and What It Means for User Privacy: A Case Study of a Developer Forum on Reddit. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432919
Liebenberg, E. (2012). Using images as an effective tool to facilitate teaching legal concepts. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité. Cahiers de l'Apliut, 31(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.4000/apliut.2260
Machuletz, D., & Böhme, R. (2019). Multiple purposes, multiple problems: A user study of consent dialogs after GDPR. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10048. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0037
McClary, J., & Stamm, S. (2021). Understanding How People Weigh the Costs and Benefits of using Facebook. In ICISSP (pp. 526-533). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010258405260533
National Cybersecurity Authority, Essential Cybersecurity Controls (ECC – 1: 2018)
OECD, ‘OECD Guidelines for Consumer Protection in the Context of Electronic Commerce (1999)’ (OECD, 2000)
OECD, ‘The Consumer Protection in E-commerce Recommendation’, 2016 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Consumer Protection in E-commerce OECD Recommendation. OECD Digital Economy Policy Legal Instruments.
Pasquale, F. (2019). A rule of persons, not machines: the limits of legal automation. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 87, 1.
Passera, S., Pohjonen, S., Koskelainen, K., & Anttila, S. (2013, October). User‐Friendly Contracting Tools–A Visual Guide to Facilitate Public Procurement Contracting. In Proceedings of the IACCM Academic Forum on Contract and Commercial Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.70
Sleimi, A. (2020). An NLP-Based Framework to Facilitate the Derivation of Legal Requirements from Legal Texts (Doctoral dissertation, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg);
Snapchat Inc. Apple store, available at https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/snapchat/id447188370 The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA)
United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection (as expanded in 1999) Department of Economic and Social Affairs. UNITED NATIONS. New York, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9399-7
WhatsApp Messenger, Apple Store, Available at https://apps.apple.com/us/app/whatsapp-messenger/id310633997
Zych, N. (2018). Plain-Language Approach in Legislative Drafting: A Perspective from Poland.Comparative Legilinguistics, 33, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2018.33.5